Showing posts with label debate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label debate. Show all posts

Thursday, 18 November 2010

Two old italian disputes

In the Middle Age disputations "offered a formalized method of debate designed to uncover and establish truths in theology and in sciences" (Wikipedia).

Bonvesin de la Riva, a Milanese writer and teacher of the 13th century, wrote some of them, for example (in old Western Lombard language):

Saturday, 30 October 2010

Debate and Argument - E. de Bono

In our Western culture argument "is the basis of our search for truth and the basis of our adversial system in science, law and politics." (de Bono 1991:5).

The use of argument as the central method of traditional conversation in law, politics and science results in a "strong tendency towards negativity and attack" (de Bono 1991:7).

"By means of argument which manoeuvres matters into a contradictory position, something can be shown to be false." (de Bono 1991:6).

"Let us look at some of the purposes of argument ... Argument can serve to point out errors of fact. It can serve to point out ... inconsistencies. ... Argument can encourage exploration of a subject ... It can present a different set of values ... It can present different experience ... At it best argument might achieve many of these purposes." (de Bono 1991:206)

"At it worst and more usual expression, argument concentrates on proving the opposing case to be false and the people putting it forward to be both stupid and motivated by self-interest."  (de Bono 1991:207)


Conversation: From Debate to Dialogue - D. Gurteen

http://www.slideshare.net/dgurteen/knowledge-cafe-workshop-may-2008-01
slide 14